Archive for the ‘Technology’ Category

Uniservity’s cLc is such a piece of shit

Tuesday, May 17th, 2011

Uniservity’s cLc is such a piece of shit. Does anybody actually use it as a learning platform? Seriously, I spend more time fighting its stupid predefined CSS rules, ‘WYSIWYG’ editor and auto HTML ‘cleanup’ (of perfectly valid HTML, I hasten to add) in in order to get the content displayed properly than I do actually creating the content in the first place.

I don’t know why anyone would, of their own free will, decide to use it as a VLE, let alone using it to host their website as we do now. We’re starting to roll out Moodle which is just so much easier to use, as well as having access to the code which makes it easier to modify/expand where neccessary. Just need to find a decent CMS and move the website over, and we’ll be free! (Well, technically free, but someone signed up to another three years of service last year without consulting me, so we’ll still be paying for it.)

thejoojoo.com using free SSL?

Sunday, December 13th, 2009

It looks like thejoojoo.com site is using a free SSL certificate issued by Comodo.

It doesn’t exactly inspire confidence if they haven’t spent $30 on a certificate when they want you to fork out $500 for their product.

cert1

cert2

Google Chrome

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

I think that Google Chrome is on the verge of replacing Opera as my browser of choice. The only features I would miss are mouse gestures (really only the back/forward navigation), opening the last active tab when closing a tab and built in content blocking.

Steam Offline Mode

Saturday, October 24th, 2009

It seems to me that somebody dropped the ball with Steam.

If it can’t connect to the Steam network, it offers to start in offline mode. However, it can’t start in offline mode unless it can connect to the Steam network.

If only Apple offered…

Thursday, September 11th, 2008

A desktop tower a little cheaper than their current cheapest iMac, I would be using an Apple computer right now. :hmm:

None of their current offerings appeal to me. Since acquiring a half decent desktop (an old work PC, on which I’ve upgraded the processor, RAM and added two HDDs) I’ve found myself using a laptop less and less, and when I do most of the time it’s RDCing into the desktop PC anyway. So spending £830 on a laptop (I want a DVD-RW, no matter what the future is ;) ) isn’t really a sane option.

The Mac Mini is too limited in many ways, the HDD is a laptop drive so it’s more expensive for less capacity, the unit itself isn’t upgradable without cracking open the case, which I would rather not do, my history of opening Apple products isn’t too good (broke the HDD connector on my 4G iPod, pierced the battery on the iPod Touch) and the integrated graphics.

I don’t want to go for an all-in-one PC, again mostly because of upgradability and ‘repairability’ (if the LCD develops a fault, the only real option is to replace the whole unit)

And the Mac Pro… well, if I could afford one without taking out a bank loan then sure, I’d love one. But until then, it’s not for me.

I’ve used OS X for a year at my previous job, and it was generally a very pleasant experience, although not without it’s faults. I’ve spent all of today playing around with OSX86 and I’ve managed to get everything else but the graphics card properly working (well, I gave up on the ethernet and am using a wireless adapter, so sue me :P ) But if I can’t even watch a video then it’s pretty much useless for me, and the interface lag will probably end up bugging me to no end.

In a weird sort of way, it’s like my experience with Linux. I generally didn’t have any major problems, there were applications which I fell in love with (Amarok!), but at the end of the day there were just minor things which over time starting to frustrate me, and I end up going back to the lesser evil. (Windows XP)

Oh, and if Apple were to release OS X for any beige box, I would be first in line for it. (As long as I have decent graphics drivers, which given NVidia’s track record with Vista is probably unlikely ;) )

iTunes 8 – Hide Genre in browser/iTunes store links on Windows

Wednesday, September 10th, 2008

iTunes 8 was released today (well yesterday, but who’s counting?) with new features like Genius sidebar/playlists, HD TV show and a new visualiser. (wow :rolleyes: )

However, they have removed two of the UI options I used, namely hiding the genre in the browser and links to the iTunes store. I don’t find browsing by genre useful; only a handful of my songs have genre tags. I’ve never thought to myself “Self, I really wish I could browse for a specific genre.” Add to that you are limited add one genre to a particular song and for me at least they are completely pointless (tags, on the other hand, would be awesome ;) )

Searching Google, there are solutions for both of these issues, but they are Mac only :hmm: . However, I’ve found the solution for Windows (which works for me anyway).

  1. Ensure iTunes is not open. Browse to the iTunes Application Data folder (C:\Documents and Settings\User\Application Data\Apple Computer\iTunes on XP, C:\Users\User\AppData\Roaming\Apple Computer\iTunes on Vista, substituting the drive letter and the user profile name where necessary.
  2. Backup and open the iTunesPrefs.xml with a half decent text editor (ie not Notepad, my personal preference is Notepad++)
  3. Find the User Preferences key, and below the <dict> tag insert:
      <key>show-genre-when-browsing</key>
      <data>
      AA==
      </data>

    to disable the genre column in the browser, and:

      <key>show-store-arrow-links</key>
      <data>
      AA==
      </data>

    to disable the links to the store.

  4. Start iTunes.

[Source]

    Google to warn users of unsafe sites

    Saturday, August 12th, 2006

    According to the BBC, Google has started to warn users when they are about to click through to a site which contains malware.

    This raises two questions:

    Why include ‘bad’ sites in the listings at all? It is already part of their quality guidelines that a site must not contain viruses, trojans or ‘badware’. They already remove or penalise sites for infringing on other guidelines (and occasionally for no reason whatsoever), so why not enforce this one as well?

    How will this affect Google Adwords? Going purely by SiteAdvisor, the majority of the sponsored links for the ‘dangerous keywords’ given by the BBC are rated as ‘Use caution’. If Google was really acting with the searcher’s best interests in mind, they wouldn’t accept advertising from sites which attempt to either scam a user by charging a subscription for products which are available for free, or spread malware. But of course, they couldn’t possibly do that, it might hurt their bottom line.

    In my admittedly short testing period, I could only find one site, which I had to search for by domain, which triggered this doorway. The SiteAdvisor plugin however listed several bad sites for each search, as well as a link to why the site was marked as such.

    If you are an IE or Firefox user on Windows, I highly recommend the SiteAdvisor plugin from McAfee. (Probably the first and only time I will recommend a piece of McAfee software. ;) ) It has a much more thorough collection of sites, warns of spam and scam sites as well as malware, and checks every site that you visit. If you are not paying attention, you might miss the SiteAdvisor warning, but it also alerts you if you attempt to download anything from the site.

    I applaud Google for taking these initial steps against malware, but if they want to do so, they should do so properly. Integrating something similar to SiteAdvisor into the Google Toolbar would be a good start.

    Warner to push ‘Music DVDs’

    Saturday, August 5th, 2006

    Wall Street Journal article

    Are they trying to encourage consumers to break the law?

    My budget for anything is rather limited. Most of my music is downloaded through eMusic or AllofMP3. I have no problem with paying £5 per month for a subscription to eMusic, even if I only download one album a month the cost of the subscription is less than what it would cost to purchase that album in a physical form. If the album isn’t available on eMusic, I’ll download it from AllofMP3. I do occasionally purchase CDs, from artists whose music has either been recommended from a friend, or I’ve downloaded from AllofMP3.

    As a Linux user, I already have to break the DRM every time I play a DVD. While I am not sure if this is against the law in the UK, it is certainly a violation of the DMCA. Now they want to add the same copy protection to music? I listen to most of my music on my PC or an MP3 player which means I would have to rip the tracks, breaking the law in the process. According to the Wall Street Journal article there will be pre ripped tracks on the DVD, but these will be ‘essentially identical’ to those downloadable from iTunes, which probably includes the DRM. There is no iTunes for Linux, and I’m not willing to switch back to Windows or get a Mac, so again I’ll end up breaking the law should I have to convert these into a usable format. Whatever I do, I’m going to end up breaking the law, so why not just download the music illegally
    anyway?

    This makes me wonder, is the music industry trying to move to a new business model of suing it’s customers?

    Of course, this new format will also have to be more expensive than current CDs.

    Why France is right

    Monday, May 1st, 2006

    In the next few days the French Senate will vote on a copyright reform bill will which will effectively outlaw DRM, as well as bringing more reasonable fines (€38 to €150) for pirating music.

    This whole story has been horribly twisted by the US media, being referred to as a war against Apple and iTunes by the New York Times, and state-sponsored piracy by Apple.

    How this bill became an attack on Apple at all I don’t know, the iPod isn’t even the dominant portable media player in France, and it targets DRM in general, so everybody is affected equally. With the US expanding the DMCA to increase the maximum prison sentence for attempted piracy to 10 years, there is finally a country setting sensible laws with the consumers, rather than businesses in mind.

    Let me make one thing clear: I don’t condone piracy. But I like freedom, and I don’t believe people are predisposed to break the law. Fair use has been steadily eroded over the past few years, and things are only going to get worse in the future. We have a country which has stepped in, and is trying to pass a law with the consumers interests in mind, rather than those of big businesses. Go after pirates, but those who are doing so as a commercial venture. Don’t sue your customers, really. The concept may seem strange, but trust me, it will make sense if you think about it.

    Are people going to start sharing all of their music on peer to peer networks because there are no restrictions on them? Only time will tell, but I feel the answer will be a resounding no. There will always be people who will obtain music illegally, but the vast majority of people are law abiding, and this law serves only to make things easier for them.

    I for one hope that this bill is passed into law in France. While it will not have any direct effect on me, it will prove an interesting test case, and hopefully politicians in other countries will sit up and take note.